.:[Double Click To][Close]:.

full wallpaper

full wallpaper. Full Collection wallpaper
  • Full Collection wallpaper



  • Almond
    07-04 06:50 PM
    Firstly, congrats!! BTW, when did you get the fingerprinting completed in your case? Want to get an idea as to how fast the whole process was done. Lets hope it is this way when our turn comes ;)


    All the info on his case is in his sig.





    full wallpaper. Feature Ys Full Wallpaper
  • Feature Ys Full Wallpaper



  • maco
    08-10 10:56 AM
    Hello All

    My employer paid me for my 485 application,he gave me his personal checks in the name of uscis, i applied with those checks, now i hear that
    "The Address Printed On your checks Must Match the adress given in work sheets[in 485]"
    I am confused,will they accept the application,checks are not cashed yet,applied on july18th
    Please Help





    full wallpaper. Pongal Wallpaper Full Size
  • Pongal Wallpaper Full Size



  • rvr_jcop
    03-27 12:38 PM
    Hi,

    I have posted a couple of times regarding my earlier situation in other threads, but I decided to create a new thread since I haven't seen a similar case before. Here's my situation:

    I was working for company A (consulting firm) on h1B since Oct 2005 and also have an approved Labor and 140 from A. I have applied for 485 in Jul 2007, and have valid EADs and APs (and extensions), but I wanted to maintain h1b status, since I have only used 3 years so far and I am the primary applicant, and my wife gave up her approved labor and h1b to work on EAD she got as a secondary applicant to my 485... so I really wanted to stay on H1B for that "Just in case" situation... I know I am paranoid ;)
    So I applied for h1 extension in June 2008 with company A, but it was pending forever... contacted USCIS once in Nov 2008, but nothing happened... I got suspicious of the company's record since I was told that comp-A was under review by USCIS for excessive h1 usage, so I decided to transfer my h1b to Company B in Dec 2008 and invoked AC21 (sent the letter)... my original h1b has expired by then and so did my I-94, but since my h1 extension was still pending, I was told it would be ok.

    In jan, USCIS sent an RFE for my transfer case requesting for various things like all my W2s since I started my h1b, EVLs from my client and Vendor, contracts between Client, Vendor and my Employer (B) etc., we also included my Paystubs for the last 6+ months and also for all of 2006 etc., and responded to the RFE in Feb, and it was again pending till mid March, when USCIS sent a similar RFE for my original extension case to company A. I no longer work with them, so I expect them to revoke my h1 petition.. so just to be safe, I applied for premium processing for my h1 transfer on Mar 13th and I got a second RFE on 3/19, which we got this week. This time USCIS sent something like this...

    What is the status of your original h1 extension? (I thought they would know ;)), and since your I-94 has expired, we might have to transfer your case for Consular processing.. if we decide to do so, what is your choice for the consulate?

    My lawyer said, they'll respond to the RFE explaining the current status, and also try to explain that I was in status all the time and request for COS instead of Consular Processing, but she says we have to let them know of the consulate in case they decide to transfer it over... and recommends that I chose Chennai (since company B is registered as BEP at Chennai).. she also said, since I have a valid EAD, I can choose to work on EAD if they decide to transfer my case to CP... and when I am ready to travel, I can go to Chennai to get my visa stamped and come back in H1b.
    Is it true that I could do something like that? I thought once I use EAD, there's no going back. Someone please shed some light on this.

    I have come to US for Masters and have worked on CPT and OPT for about 1.5 years before I got onto H1B. I was always paid well more than the LCA wage, and am currently being paid more than my approved labor wage. I have no problem in proving my legal status here, but as you can understand, I am worried and paranoid to go for stamping in these difficult times.. I am afraid they might come up with some reason to deny my entry/visa like 'there are so many citizens without job' etc.,

    Any productive feedback is highly appreciated...

    pal :)

    Hey buddy, not to discourage you but, do you think its all worth when you have EAD in hand. I know you got 3 more years on H1-B but ask yourself a question and then make wise decision. Do you want to start all over again god forbid something happens to your 485?





    full wallpaper. Full Moon Howl Live Wallpaper
  • Full Moon Howl Live Wallpaper



  • Suva
    03-03 11:06 AM
    What is AGI?

    Just eFiled Federal and its already accepted.. My AGI was as it was last year and for spouse (new SSN) put AGI=0.. I needed to confirm the AGI twice and it went thru then.. And next day I received email that return has been accepted... Didn't filed state for personal reasons...

    So I don't see any reason why not eFile.. its faster... Lots of others have already done and thats how I came to know that I need to enter spouse's AGI=0... And filed using her new SSN.. No mention of ITIN anywhere...



    more...


    full wallpaper. Nexus One Wallpaper Full of
  • Nexus One Wallpaper Full of



  • Catherine
    11-18 12:34 AM
    Thank you flresident, I really appreciate the advice. Unfortunately the group I had been getting some help from had to cut a number of services when their funding was cut a couple months ago. All the other help and advice I've received from those quarters has either led to a dead-end or provided me with exactly the kind of conflicting advice I mentioned. Nonetheless, I do thank you for the idea.

    I wonder if there are any other ideas out there? Thanks one and all.





    full wallpaper. Hubble Full Wallpaper
  • Hubble Full Wallpaper



  • same_old_guy
    05-22 05:13 PM
    Checking out this section of the bill :

    (2) PENDING AND APPROVED PETITIONS AND APPLICATIONS.�Petitions
    for an employment-based visa filed for classification under
    section 203(b)(1), (2), or (3) of the Immigration and Nationality
    Act (as such provisions existed prior to the enactment of this
    section) that were filed prior to the date of the introduction of
    the [Insert title of Act] and were pending or approved at the time of
    the effective date of this section, shall be treated as if such
    provision remained effective and an approved petition may serve
    as the basis for issuance of an immigrant visa. Aliens with
    applications for a labor certification pursuant to section
    212(a)(5)(A) of the Immigration and Nationality Act shall
    preserve the immigrant visa priority date accorded by the date
    of filing of such labor certification application.


    It says something about preserving priority date. Is there any provision to port the priority date from old system to new system. I am sure there would some sort of concept for priority date in the new system.

    Now if we can transfer our priority date from old system we would definitely get some benefit in the new system. Any comments ?



    more...


    full wallpaper. wallpaper full background
  • wallpaper full background



  • ryan
    01-26 03:18 PM
    Hi Friends, I searched through some of the prior posts and did not find the answer. I am not looking for cities to live in from the point of view of job, taxes, weather, desi population, desi amenties such as movies, restaurants etc...

    Please, don't take this wrong way. I assume you moved to the US to seek the positives this land has to offer your children, whilst holding on to certain cultures / values from your hometown. Hence, I don't understand why you would relocate to the other side of the planet and seek the best place for "Indian" children to live?! I would reckon, it is probably your hometown, in India.

    Very few get to have the cake and eat it too.

    I have lived in 4 states, in the 8 years I have lived in this country. I have NEVER faced racism or discrimination of any sort. No place is perfect. However, this country does stand head and shoulders above a lot of places. Try and fit in.





    full wallpaper. full hd wallpaper 0077
  • full hd wallpaper 0077



  • cmphr
    03-29 02:06 PM
    My friend's PERM got approved in 5 days in Dec '09. His I-140 got approved in 3 weeks in March '10. This could be an exceptional case as I have not seen any other such approvals..



    more...


    full wallpaper. full hd wallpaper 0050
  • full hd wallpaper 0050



  • milind70
    10-15 02:03 PM
    Hi,

    Probably ur 485 is going be approved soon!We had only one soft LUD after fp in our 485s on 7th sep 2007,and no luds on i-140 and i-131 till date??

    goodluck,
    vaishu

    I think not since his PD is 2006.





    full wallpaper. full c 1088x776 wallpaper full
  • full c 1088x776 wallpaper full



  • pt326bc
    10-31 06:30 PM
    I agree with BharatPremi.
    Address is a sensitive issue here in the US. USCIS aims to keep a tab on all aliens and has a rule regarding address changes being notified to the USCIS. They actually can penalize somebody who does not follow this rule.
    So giving out a temporary address when you first arrive in the country could be okay but it is not okay once you start your employment/credit history.
    Every address you have ever put on your credit card application/where you have received utility bills/received car insurance papers/dmv documents is actually pretty easily traced.
    Just try accessing your credit report. It will list out all the addresses you have been in the past few years.
    So having your friend's address for correspondence is a little tricky.
    I have tried to have a PO box for correspondence with utility companies/credit cards/bank statements but as I understand you cannot provide a PO Box address to USCIS.
    If I remember correctly when I went for fingerprinting they actually had a section for physical address and one for mailing address; but for most parts the documents you fill out for USCIS don't allow you the option of filling out separate physical address and mailing address.
    Since the potential for being penalized by USCIS exists you should contact your lawyer and try to figure it out.
    Regards.



    more...


    full wallpaper. Full Size HD Wallpaper By SmpX
  • Full Size HD Wallpaper By SmpX



  • sertasheep
    06-14 09:13 PM
    You can file for your EAD and AP concurrently while you file for your I-485.

    EAD and AP are optional and don't necessarily need to be filed along with 485, and can be filed anytime as long as your I-485 has been filed , or is being filed.





    full wallpaper. Full Size HD Wallpaper
  • Full Size HD Wallpaper



  • walking_dude
    11-21 11:08 AM
    Your links are working ,despite how they show up in your post. Click on them and see for yourself!

    Let's work for our cause, instead of worrying about what benefits others are getting due to political reasons.

    Cubans are politically active and highly vocal in advocacy of their cause. Are you?



    more...


    full wallpaper. Murugan Wallpaper Full Size
  • Murugan Wallpaper Full Size



  • akhilmahajan
    04-23 09:30 AM
    I have not got my i140 approval yet........

    but the Receipt i got for my i140 says:-

    Notice Type: Approval Notice
    Section: Mern of Profession w/Adv Deg,or
    of Excentn'l Abllitv
    Sec .203.(b) (2)

    So, does that mean it is being processed for EB2.

    thanks.





    full wallpaper. full metal alchemist wallpaper
  • full metal alchemist wallpaper



  • ChainReaction
    04-02 02:28 PM
    I had filed for my 6th year h1b extension without the lawyer , I did so bec the paper work was similar to my last extension ,and i saw that lots of people on the IV forum had Filed the H1b extension themselves.

    Anyways, my human resource personal hired a new secretory and she some how misplaced my H1b receipt/possible RFE? , I have the EAC # from my cancel check ; when i check my status online it says case received and pending my PD is Jan08 ,2007 and the CSC is processing Jan. 13th, my question is if a RFE is issued will that be posted on the online case status website? I have asked the HR to request a duplicate copy from INS , should i also ask them to contact USCIS over the phone in addition to the written request?



    more...


    full wallpaper. Full Wallpaper :
  • Full Wallpaper :



  • terpcurt
    November 2nd, 2003, 10:44 AM
    Both of the following are about 500KB, so beforewarned...

    I put a smaller beetle macro into the front-page gallery area, but here's a couple others.

    1 Upclose and personal with a dandelion.

    2. The same lens, used conventionally for a landscape. I printed this out at 19x13 and it's going to get framed.



    Nice shots.......... I like the close ups with Macro, and also the landscapes with the old buildings overrun with ivy

    ead job suggest please [Archive] - Immigration Voice

    View Full Version : ead job suggest please






    full wallpaper. Full Wallpaper :
  • Full Wallpaper :



  • immieb2
    09-25 04:55 PM
    Good find. I can use this to explain to American friends at work



    more...


    full wallpaper. Perry Full Hd Wallpaper No
  • Perry Full Hd Wallpaper No



  • yagw
    12-14 07:59 PM
    Got red with following comments:

    "reputation" ?? lol this is a website, and these are forum ID's , they dont represent anything tangible or personal, please work on the real issues and leave the green/reds for school kids to fight over, thanks

    If green/reds are for kids, why the f*** you use it moron. If you have guts come out and say it in the thread. Otherwise, get the f*** outa here.





    full wallpaper. full moon wallpaper.
  • full moon wallpaper.



  • sumansk
    06-30 02:36 PM
    Babloo Bhaiyye...
    Even I am very positive and I am hopeful everything will be fine..
    Everyone please use our combined CONCIOUSNESS to affect the adverse decison from DOS or USCIS..

    Thanks and stay positive and spread the POSITIVE ENERGY by use of our subconcious ENERGY....IT IS A MAGICAL ENERGY...





    full wallpaper. full hd wallpaper 0010
  • full hd wallpaper 0010



  • zCool
    04-01 06:02 PM
    I am waiting for 13 yrs! So frustration should not be excuse for law-breaking..
    Every criminal has some sob story in the back-end that can be used to justify murder, robbery etc etc..
    Anyways..
    You want help.. here goes..
    THERE IS NO LABOR SUBSTITUTION as of June 16 2007.
    If your old sub labor was used by someone else.. AND his GC is not approved yet THEN your company can revoke that 140 and get your 140 approved that way. IF on the other hand that original beneficiary got 485 filed and AC21 invoked then you are plain out of luck.
    I don't know what the heck this company B is talking abt, sending other labor etc.. I think they are pulling some stunt.. and basically lying!
    If you have an option.. change and work for a good employer.. GC and all will happen in due time..





    techskill
    08-10 11:49 AM
    thats sigh of relief for me.
    My friends attorney did'nt file his 485 unless he got new checks with his address imprinted on them.poor guy had to order new set of checks.
    Not sure why attorneys do this



    If the address in the checks and the applications should match then most of the AOS applications will be rejected for mismatch.





    krishna_brc
    05-05 08:54 AM
    Yes, we don't need original I-485 receipt notice to travel.
    I traveled without original I-485.
    see below for USCIS note on this
    ----
    [Federal Register: November 1, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 211)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Page 61791-61793]
    From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
    [DOCID:fr01no07-1]
    Rules and Regulations
    Federal Register
    __________________________________________________ ____________________
    This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
    having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
    to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
    under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
    The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
    Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
    week.
    DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
    U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
    8 CFR Part 245
    [CIS No. 2420-07; Docket No. USCIS-2007-0047]
    RIN 1615-AB62
    Removal of Receipt Requirement for Certain H and L Adjustment
    Applicants Returning From a Trip Outside the United States
    AGENCY: U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, DHS.
    ACTION: Final rule.
    SUMMARY: This rule removes the requirement that certain H and L
    nonimmigrants returning to the United States following a trip abroad
    must present a receipt notice for their adjustment of status
    applications to avoid having such applications deemed abandoned. The
    purpose of this narrow change is to remove an unnecessary documentation
    requirement from the regulations that the Department of Homeland
    Security has determined causes an undue burden on H and L
    nonimmigrants.
    DATES: Effective Date: This rule is effective November 1, 2007.
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carol Vernon, Regulations and Product
    Management Division, Domestic Operations, U.S. Citizenship and
    Immigration Services, Department of Homeland Security, 20 Massachusetts
    Avenue, Room 2034, Washington, DC 20529, telephone (202) 272-8350.
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    I. Background
    Travel outside the United States for an alien who has filed Form I-
    485, ``Application to Register Permanent Residence or Adjust Status,''
    to obtain lawful permanent resident status under section 245 of the
    Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), 8 U.S.C. 1255, may adversely
    affect that application unless the alien takes certain steps before the
    trip. Most applicants must obtain permission from U.S. Citizenship and
    Immigration Services (USCIS) to travel prior to the trip, a process
    referred to as ``advance parole.'' See 8 CFR 212.5 (c) and (f). For
    these applicants, departing the United States without advance parole
    while their adjustment of status applications are pending results in
    automatic abandonment of the applications and constitutes grounds for
    denial. 8 CFR 245.2(a)(4)(ii)(A) & (B).

    III. Rulemaking Requirements

    DHS finds that this rule relates to internal agency management,
    procedure, and practice and therefore is exempt from the public comment
    requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) under 5 U.S.C.
    553(b)(A). This rule does not alter substantive criteria by which USCIS
    will approve or deny applications or determine eligibility for any
    immigration benefit. Instead, this rule relieves a document
    presentation requirement for certain applicants for immigration
    benefits. Specifically, this rule removes the requirement that H-1/H-4
    and L-1/L-2 nonimmigrants present a Form I-797 receipt notice for their
    adjustment of status applications upon readmission to the United States
    after a trip abroad in order to avoid having their applications
    abandoned. This document presentation requirement is unnecessary since
    it concerns information that is already available to DHS. This final
    rule merely eliminates an unnecessary burden on these arriving aliens
    and streamlines agency management of its processes. As a result, DHS is
    not required to provide the public with an opportunity to submit
    comments on the subject matter of this rule.
    Moreover, DHS finds that good cause exists under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B)
    to make the rule effective upon publication in the Federal Register
    without prior notice and public comment on the grounds that delaying
    implementation of this rule to allow for public comment would be
    impracticable and contrary to the public interest. As a result of
    USCIS's July 17, 2007, announcement that it would accept employment-
    based Forms I-485 filed by aliens whose priority dates are current
    under Department of State Visa Bulletin No. 107, USCIS received an
    unprecedented volume of employment-based applications for adjustment of
    status, including those filed by H and L nonimmigrants. Because of the
    recent surge in such filings, it will take several weeks for USCIS to
    enter the necessary data and issue Form I-797 receipt notices for
    employment-based adjustment of status applications. Therefore, it is
    important for this rule to take effect as soon as possible to avoid
    undue hardship on applicants who may need travel outside the United
    States prior to receiving the receipt notice.
    In addition, no substantive rights or obligations of the affected
    public are changed by this rule. DHS believes the public will welcome
    this change. The public needs no time to conform its conduct so as to
    avoid violation of these regulations because the rule relieves a
    requirement of the existing regulations. Further, this rule will have
    no adverse impact on DHS' adjudicatory responsibilities or ability to
    track the foreign travel of affected persons since DHS already records
    the admission of all nonimigrants. For these reasons, this rule is
    effective immediately under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(1) and (3).
    This rule relates to internal agency management, and, therefore, is
    exempt from the provisions of Executive Order Nos. 12630, 12988, 13045,
    13132, 13175, 13211, and 13272. This rule is not considered by DHS to
    be a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866,
    section 3(f), Regulatory Planning and Review. Therefore, it has not
    been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget. Further, this
    action is not a proposed rule requiring an initial or final regulatory
    flexibility analysis under the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601
    et seq. In addition, this rule is not subject to the National
    Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq., Title
    II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995, 2 U.S.C. Ch. 17A, 25,
    or the E-Government Act of 2002, 44 U.S.C. 3501, note.
    Finally, under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-
    13, all Departments are required to submit to the Office of Management
    and Budget (OMB), for review and approval, any reporting requirements
    inherent in a rule. This rule does not affect any information
    collections, reporting or recordkeeping requirements under the
    Paperwork Reduction Act.

    List of Subjects in 8 CFR Part 245

    Aliens, Immigration, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

    Accordingly, part 245 of chapter 1 of title 8 of the Code of Federal
    Regulations is amended as follows:

    PART 245--ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS TO THAT OF PERSON ADMITTED FOR
    PERMANENT RESIDENCE

    1. The authority citation for part 245 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 8 U.S.C. 1101, 1103, 1182, 1255; sec. 202, Pub. L.
    105-100, 111 Stat. 2160, 2193; sec. 902, Pub. L. 105-277, 112 Stat.
    2681; 8 CFR part 2.

    2. Section 245.2 is amended by revising paragraph (a)(4)(ii)(C) as
    follows:


    Sec. 245.2 Application.

    (a) * * *
    (4) * * *
    (ii) * * *
    (C) The travel outside of the United States by an applicant for
    adjustment of status who is not under exclusion, deportation, or
    removal proceeding and who is in lawful H-1 or L-1 status shall not be
    deemed an abandonment of the application if, upon returning to this
    country, the alien remains eligible for H or L status, is coming to
    resume employment with the same employer for whom he or she had
    previously been authorized to work as an H-1 or L-1 nonimmigrant, and,
    is in possession of a valid H or L visa (if required). The travel
    outside of the United States by an applicant for adjustment of status
    who is not under exclusion, deportation, or removal proceeding and who
    is in lawful H-4 or L-2 status shall not be deemed an abandonment of
    the application if the spouse or parent of such alien through whom the
    H-4 or L-2 status was obtained is maintaining H-1 or L-1 status and the
    alien remains otherwise eligible for H-4 or L-2 status, and, the alien
    is in possession of a valid H-4 or L-2 visa (if required). The travel
    outside of the United States by an applicant for adjustment of status,
    who is not under exclusion, deportation, or removal proceeding and who
    is in lawful K-3 or K-4 status shall not be deemed an abandonment of
    the application if, upon returning to this country, the alien is in
    possession of a valid K-3 or K-4 visa and remains eligible for K-3 or
    K-4 status.

    Dated: October 15, 2007.
    Michael Chertoff,
    Secretary.
    [FR Doc. E7-21506 Filed 10-31-07; 8:45 am]

    BILLING CODE 4410-10-P